> On Dec. 15, 2015, 12:35 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > docs/containerizer-internals.md, lines 15-23
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/diff/4/?file=1163799#file1163799line15>
> >
> >     What about moveing this after ### Type of containerizers
> 
> Jojy Varghese wrote:
>     Since this section is common to all containerizers, I liked it here. WDYT?
>     
>     Thanks Guangya.
> 
> Guangya Liu wrote:
>     It is ok to put it here, my thinking is that it would be better if we put 
> this after giving end user a concept introduciton for all of the 
> containerizers. I do not have strong opinion on this and this depends on you 
> ;-)

dropping this as per our comments.


- Jojy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/#review110340
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 15, 2015, 6:22 p.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 15, 2015, 6:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Documentation: added containerizer internals
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/containerizer-internals.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/home.md a01612ec8347eb8a7a9277b829365b6c3a1fe9e3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39456/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jojy Varghese
> 
>

Reply via email to