-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39466/#review112474
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thanks [~joerg84] for the patch. Can you help me understand why aren't we going 
forward with the following approach as had been already alluded to by 
[~bmahler] on the JIRA:

- Expose the `internal::http::request` function in the header and not add an 
additional method/overload for `put` function at all.
- We might at a latter point of time try to clean the other instances of 
`post/get` to use the `http::request` method.

To me, we don't seem to be gaining much by adding these additional 
method/overloads for the `put` method when we eventually would want to move 
away from them. For one, they are making the eventual cleanup harder. What do 
you think ?

- Anand Mazumdar


On Jan. 2, 2016, 1:47 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39466/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 2, 2016, 1:47 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Bernd Mathiske.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3763
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3763
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added http::put request method.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp 
> f0666f0fa48c4f3a98332d12066561a02a715236 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/http.cpp e937df6875c8024ea9c178833b9faceede990969 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/http_tests.cpp 
> 19261502be220aaa40add7ce30a9b2b65d1d9fdc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39466/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>

Reply via email to