-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42908/#review117954
-----------------------------------------------------------



lgtm


src/tests/master_quota_tests.cpp (line 901)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42908/#comment179247>

    I feel this comment as-is does not add much.
    
    Either removing it or supplying a reasoning in that comment would be more 
helpful, no?


- Till Toenshoff


On Jan. 29, 2016, 10:34 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42908/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 29, 2016, 10:34 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Michael Park and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4542
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4542
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The `AvailableResourcesAfterRescinding` test became flaky after we
> stopped offering unreserved resources beyond quota in
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42835. Hence the allocator offers
> rescinded resources to `framework1` if an allocation happens before
> the test finishes, which violates the expectation that `framework1`
> receives resources only once. Since we do not really care about
> allocations in this test but rather about rescinded resources, the
> fix is just to ignore subsequent offers to `framework1`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_quota_tests.cpp 04efcf3362d3594e0ad8077793fa1f32536dd658 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42908/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> On Mac OS 10.10.4:
> `GTEST_FILTER="MasterQuotaTest.AvailableResourcesAfterRescinding" 
> ./bin/mesos-tests.sh --gtest_shuffle --gtest_break_on_failure 
> --gtest_repeat=5000`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to