-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43880/#review121860
-----------------------------------------------------------




docs/monitoring.md (line 879)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43880/#comment183701>

    Maybe "Allocated resources of kind KIND"?



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp (line 284)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43880/#comment183702>

    Maybe move this comment into r/44260/?



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp (lines 447 - 450)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43880/#comment183703>

    Do you still need it?



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (lines 540 - 545)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43880/#comment183704>

    Let's call it right after `CHECK_*`s



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (lines 1711 - 1712)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43880/#comment183705>

    My intuition is that using `allocationScalarQuantities` will be more 
efficient. However, we should expose known clients from the sorter. What do you 
think?



src/master/allocator/mesos/metrics.cpp (lines 78 - 81)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43880/#comment183709>

    Why not using C++ lambdas instead of `bind`?


- Alexander Rukletsov


On March 3, 2016, 1:12 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43880/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 3, 2016, 1:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4720
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4720
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/monitoring.md 827f7073204fcf8575ca980a5571c8be4f5e4110 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 3043888630b066505410d3b32c5b3f813cc458c1 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> 70291075c00a9a557529c2562dedcfc6c6c3ec32 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/metrics.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/metrics.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/hierarchical_allocator_tests.cpp 
> 3e4ad31925e1b815a74d67fa3962d23fa5bc89d1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43880/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (OS X)
> 
> I confirmed that this does not lead to general performance regressions in the 
> allocator; this is partially expected since the added code only inserts 
> metrics in the allocator while the actual work is perform asynchronously. 
> These tests where performed with 
> `HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_Test.DeclineOffers` on an optimized build 
> under OS X using clang(trunk) as compiler.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to