> On April 26, 2016, 6:51 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/slave/http.cpp, line 655
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/diff/6/?file=1361111#file1361111line655>
> >
> >     You remove the `Future` here. I believe this is on purpose as it seems 
> > the right way to pass the parameter (without future). Is it a bugfix or it 
> > doesn't influence the thrust?

Did you review the latest revision?


> On April 26, 2016, 6:51 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/tests/slave_authorization_tests.cpp, lines 198-200
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/diff/6/?file=1361113#file1361113line198>
> >
> >     Maybe kill this blank lines?

Let's leave some room here.


> On April 26, 2016, 6:51 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/slave/http.cpp, line 627
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/diff/6/?file=1361111#file1361111line627>
> >
> >     Indent the block by 2 spaces, not 4.

Knowing we care a lot about this, I did actually put some care into making this 
consistent with the style guide.

Here and elsewhere: Our style guide states in the section *Function 
Definition/Invocation* that
> Newline when calling or defining a function: indent with four spaces.

Are you confusing this with the rule on continuations?,
> Newline for an assignment statement: indent with two spaces.

I believe we are not performing an assignment, but a function invocation here.

Note that further down in the style guide there are examples of `.then` 
inconsistent with the indention rules.


> On April 26, 2016, 6:51 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/slave/http.cpp, line 635
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/diff/6/?file=1361111#file1361111line635>
> >
> >     Indent the block by 2 spaces, not 4.

ditto.


> On April 26, 2016, 6:51 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/slave/http.cpp, line 637
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/diff/6/?file=1361111#file1361111line637>
> >
> >     Indent the block by 2 spaces, not 4.

ditto.


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/#review130639
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 26, 2016, 8:22 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 26, 2016, 8:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Alexander Rojas, and Jan Schlicht.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5164
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5164
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added authorization to agents' `/monitor/statistics` endpoints.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/http.cpp 537736d1fe42e8150bad91326299ef9a17041a8e 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 57b18882e30e44dcc40449b0e3be8ee970c45bc8 
>   src/tests/slave_authorization_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46319/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (OS X, clang w/o optimization)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to