> On May 9, 2016, 9:12 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/master/http.cpp, line 2872
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46784/diff/3/?file=1369724#file1369724line2872>
> >
> >     Why don't we return `MethodNotAllowed` here? Same applies to the agent, 
> > actually : )
> 
> Jan Schlicht wrote:
>     Because `authorizeEndpoint` isn't supposed to create a `http::Response`. 
> Its purpose is to answer the question whether a principal is authorized to do 
> things and it's the caller's responsibility to create a HTTP response from 
> that answer. But to create the answer, the function needs informations that 
> it extracts from the HTTP request. Because these informations may be missing, 
> we need to handle that case here, hence we fail the `Future`.

So now we return "HTTP/1.1 503 Service Unavailable" in this case. Do you think 
it's right?

In retrospect, there was a mistake to move request parsing into this function. 
You know check that the request is correctly formed in `authorizeEndpoint()`, 
from where you can't return `Response`. I suggest to split this function in 
two: one for parsing and another for mapping principal to subject.


> On May 9, 2016, 9:12 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> > src/master/http.cpp, line 879
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46784/diff/3/?file=1369724#file1369724line879>
> >
> >     In r/46203/ you've cached flags and passed them into continuation. Here 
> > you call `master->flags` in the continuation. Why is the approach different 
> > to the one for the agent?
> 
> Jan Schlicht wrote:
>     See [MESOS-5293](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5293).
>     tldr; We can do it for the master, but (currently) not for the agent.

But it does not prevent us from following the pattern we used in the agent 
here, right?


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46784/#review132228
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 3, 2016, 12:42 p.m., Jan Schlicht wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46784/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 3, 2016, 12:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Benjamin Bannier.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5297
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5297
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Access to the '/flags' endpoint is authorized using
> the 'GET_ENDPOINT_WITH_PATH' action.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp 4985f24b70a00116caa4bd0335ea51e55d878d19 
>   src/master/master.hpp 3e55114ee7866e06513071e86e15608099dae052 
>   src/tests/master_authorization_tests.cpp 
> 804b39a269c09df9f6c0bbdf6f8b53921ac09ce8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46784/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jan Schlicht
> 
>

Reply via email to