-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/#review141133
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/appc/runtime.cpp (line 90)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/#comment206546>

    kill this line



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/appc/runtime.cpp (lines 215 - 219)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/#comment206554>

    So for the case of sh=0,value=0,argv=1,Exec=1, what about the value of 
`Exec[1]...` etc? Should not it be `./Exec[0] Exec[1] ... argv`



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/appc/runtime.cpp (line 259)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/#comment206550>

    It is not suggested to use reference here according to 
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/docs/c%2B%2B-style-guide.md#capture-by-reference



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/appc/runtime.cpp (line 265)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/#comment206551>

    Seems you are losing the logic to handle logic in row 2 when there are 
arguments?



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/appc/runtime.cpp (line 287)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/#comment206548>

    s/WorkingDirectory/workingDirectory


- Guangya Liu


On July 6, 2016, 6:32 a.m., Srinivas Brahmaroutu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 6, 2016, 6:32 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4778
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4778
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added implementation to Appc Runtime Isolator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/appc/runtime.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Srinivas Brahmaroutu
> 
>

Reply via email to