> On July 6, 2016, 11:38 p.m., Guangya Liu wrote: > > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/appc/runtime.cpp, lines 215-219 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/diff/6/?file=1437512#file1437512line215> > > > > So for the case of sh=0,value=0,argv=1,Exec=1, what about the value of > > `Exec[1]...` etc? Should not it be `./Exec[0] Exec[1] ... argv` > > Gilbert Song wrote: > Thanks Guangya. Let's keep this open. > > It depends on whether or not users have the ability to overwrite. > > Guangya Liu wrote: > Yes, but I thin at least we need to clarify the behaviro in comments and > the document if there are multiple exec.
Guangya, I think it is the right semantic to have the users able to overwrite. Thanks for deep dive. @Srini, could you add comments on why we do it this way? - Gilbert ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/#review141133 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 12, 2016, 9:15 a.m., Srinivas Brahmaroutu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 12, 2016, 9:15 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos. > > > Bugs: MESOS-4778 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4778 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added implementation to Appc Runtime Isolator. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/appc/runtime.cpp PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49348/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Srinivas Brahmaroutu > >
