> On Oct. 17, 2016, 11:22 a.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote:
> > src/health-check/health_checker.cpp, lines 358-359
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/52867/diff/2/?file=1538082#file1538082line358>
> >
> >     I asked the same to AlexR in private. Apparently it is not possible to 
> > capture object members in C++11.

Got it, thank you!


- haosdent


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52867/#review152851
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 14, 2016, 3:26 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52867/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 14, 2016, 3:26 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Daniel Pravat, Gastón Kleiman, haosdent huang, and 
> Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Additionally persist health check parameters from the `HealthCheck`
> protobuf as class members to avoid code duplication.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/health-check/health_checker.hpp 
> 392b4d5bd1e5831994b9366c1eb5a2911e19860f 
>   src/health-check/health_checker.cpp 
> 96ae1a733ff3d211b84d0893b4603873af1c89f0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52867/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/52873/.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to