-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52534/#review158858
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!




I feel it's hard to explain this patch without /r/51027/. It's probably better 
to have it go after /r/51027/ in the chain. It's fine if /r/51027/ requires 
this patch to pass the tests.


src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp (line 230)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/52534/#comment229684>

    Can we conslidate the comments in one place so we can provide better 
context without too much redundancy?
    
    Here we can say something like:
    
    ```
    Helper for dispatching `expire()` after a delay. See comments in 
`recoverResources()`.
    ```



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (lines 1072 - 1073)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/52534/#comment229688>

    How about the following comment? I feel it's clearer.
    
    ```
    Because the batch `allocate()` dispatches `run()`, we use `_expire()` to 
dispatch `expire()` after at least the same delay to make sure the offer filter 
remains active for at least a single allocation run.
    ```


- Jiang Yan Xu


On Oct. 4, 2016, 4:28 p.m., Jacob Janco wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52534/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 4, 2016, 4:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - With an asynchronous `batch()` allocation,
>   this ensures that filters do not expire
>   before the next allocation.
> - This patch should be reverted when allocation
>   occurs on resource recovery.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 2c31471ee0f5d6836393bf87ff9ecfd8df835013 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> c8f9492ee1b69e125a1e841116d22a578a9b524e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52534/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> With https://reviews.apache.org/r/51027/: 
> 
> GTEST_FILTER="-*SmallOfferFilter*" make check -j8
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jacob Janco
> 
>

Reply via email to