-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/#review164608
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/launcher/executor.cpp (line 327)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/#comment236371>

    can we also add a REASON_TASK_HEALTHCHECK_STATUS_UPDATED for consistency?



src/launcher/executor.cpp (line 453)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/#comment236372>

    there is a lot of code duplication in the call sites of checker and health 
checker and their code itself. I know you had a TODO, but can you ensure there 
is a ticket for tracking the de-duplication of code? we should tackle that 
sooner than latter, hopefully even before 1.3 is cut. otherwise it will be a 
nightmare to maintain both.


- Vinod Kone


On Feb. 2, 2017, 9:57 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 2, 2017, 9:57 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6906
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6906
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/launcher/executor.cpp 0c770bb18ae8bd8df85589b5262f457ab50574a9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56212/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/56218/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to