> On Jan. 4, 2018, 7:06 p.m., Ilya Pronin wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp
> > Lines 10061 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/64940/diff/1/?file=1930130#file1930130line10062>
> >
> >     Nit: The expression can be simplified to `!terminal && unreachable`.

I think it's a matter of taste which is more readable ;)


> On Jan. 4, 2018, 7:06 p.m., Ilya Pronin wrote:
> > src/tests/master_tests.cpp
> > Lines 7626 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/64940/diff/1/?file=1930131#file1930131line7626>
> >
> >     Just curious: why do you pause the clock here? To speed up the test 
> > (i.e. not wait for `allocation_interval`)?

Yeh that was weird, I removed it.


- James


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/64940/#review194772
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 4, 2018, 1:35 a.m., James Peach wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/64940/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 4, 2018, 1:35 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gaston Kleiman, Jie Yu, and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8337
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8337
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If an agent is lost, we try to remove all the tasks that might
> have been lost. However, if a task is already terminal, it hasn't
> really been lost so we should not be tracking it in the framework's
> unreachable tasks list.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp 8fe9420dbe03ea2cefc6a40b0f64284aa9fe7915 
>   src/master/master.cpp 282fdf8ac38e3613c621c1c8e5c50f27bde9dafd 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 5546fd937d078c1f757964d5163449ffd993388e 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/64940/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (Fedora 27)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James Peach
> 
>

Reply via email to