> On Feb. 23, 2018, 5:38 p.m., Gilbert Song wrote:
> > src/docker/docker.cpp
> > Lines 151 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65683/diff/5/?file=1963585#file1963585line151>
> >
> >     Should we do `killtree()` even if the status is not pending (e.g., 
> > ready or failure)?
> >     
> >     If the semantic (caller invokes `.discard()` -> no longer care about 
> > the subprocess) is something we want to define for the library, should we 
> > always killtree regardless whatever status?

I think it's incorrect for us to kill the process if `s.status()` is no longer 
pending. In that case, the process has actually terminated, so the PID could be 
some completely unrelated process which was spawned recently.


- Greg


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/65683/#review198188
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 23, 2018, 11:07 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/65683/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 23, 2018, 11:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Andrei Budnik, Gilbert Song, Michael Park, and 
> Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8575
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8575
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Updated discard handling of the Docker 'inspect' call.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/docker/docker.hpp d9e71f8841a868082170d28fc4f3d495e2eb1e61 
>   src/docker/docker.cpp 3df370e988fce12d323ff6b441da15dab27bdd28 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65683/diff/6/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to