-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67777/#review205766
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp
Lines 663-664 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67777/#comment288656>

    Can you add a TODO to consider pulling this up into the framework struct 
and what's needed to make that happen?



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp
Lines 665 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67777/#comment288657>

    How about `isCapableForAgent` or `isCapableOnAgent` or 
`isCapableOfReceivingAgent`?



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp
Lines 666 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67777/#comment288654>

    Can you just take the Framework struct here? Feels a little odd that we 
take framework capabilities but not agent capabilities (I realize we can't take 
agent capabilities only, but seems like the caller doesn't need to know which 
bits of framework and slave structs we need?)


- Benjamin Mahler


On July 4, 2018, 12:19 a.m., Meng Zhu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67777/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 4, 2018, 12:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8916
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8916
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> `isFrameworkCapableReceivingAgent` checks if a framework
> is capable of receiving resources on the agent based on
> the framework capability.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 0f6c0e96a105c64465d3f5db4ff663d8fdfe7e26 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> 5a6cd3d2fc5bdbaaee2d05b9be9e83d4107c749b 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67777/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Meng Zhu
> 
>

Reply via email to