-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69557/#review211249
-----------------------------------------------------------



Can you clarify when the transition from "previously" to "now" occurred? Is it 
due to your other pending patches, or was this something we changed in a 
previous release?

If it's part of your pending patches, we might have to keep the empty == unset 
behavior, since I'm not sure which frameworks were relying on that.

- Benjamin Mahler


On Dec. 12, 2018, 11:29 a.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69557/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 12, 2018, 11:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Meng Zhu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9469
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9469
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We were previously treating empty framework IDs like unset framework
> IDs and were maintaining dedicated handling for this case.
> 
> Since we now reject empty framework IDs this handling is not required
> anymore and removed in this patch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 3de0fd35cc815f4b5787ee2cb5e81f5059d7a47c 
>   src/sched/sched.cpp e77a02951831a7e0c5d9a9068f8d014cb1478382 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69557/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to