----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68017/#review211613 -----------------------------------------------------------
include/mesos/slave/containerizer.proto Line 26 (original), 26 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68017/#comment296968> See my comment below, and just add: ``` import "mesos/seccomp/seccomp.proto`; ``` include/mesos/slave/containerizer.proto Lines 197 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68017/#comment296967> As we discussed last time, could we move this protobuf message to `include/mesos/seccomp/` dir, since this is not user facing API in the future, nor container life cycle managerment (in containerizer.proto). - Gilbert Song On Nov. 8, 2018, 7:24 a.m., Andrei Budnik wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/68017/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 8, 2018, 7:24 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Jie Yu, James Peach, and Qian Zhang. > > > Bugs: MESOS-9033 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9033 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto 2ef6ba3aef67cf34227569948fd3ddc8dfd5879d > include/mesos/slave/containerizer.proto > 5b4dcdda0f55ea3355c78d1447c7be9ca54d9dc9 > include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 1a701da65f653fe4191f92ff1fb1436809b50acb > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68017/diff/11/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Andrei Budnik > >
