Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6508#discussion_r31385881
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ExecutorAllocationManager.scala ---
@@ -443,9 +466,27 @@ private[spark] class ExecutorAllocationManager(
private def onExecutorIdle(executorId: String): Unit = synchronized {
if (executorIds.contains(executorId)) {
if (!removeTimes.contains(executorId) &&
!executorsPendingToRemove.contains(executorId)) {
+
+ val hasCachedBlocks =
+ executorsWithCachedBlocks.contains(executorId) ||
+
executorEndpoints.get(executorId).exists(_.askWithRetry[Boolean](HasCachedBlocks))
+
+ if (hasCachedBlocks) executorsWithCachedBlocks += executorId
--- End diff --
That is the case, and I completely agree that it does save us an RPC. I'm
just saying we should keep the map as long as we clean it up and deal with
cached blocks being evicted. E.g. the user may explicitly unpersist RDDs to
make their executors die more quickly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
