arham0254A opened a new pull request, #56664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/56664

   
   
   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'common/utils/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   This PR modifies the `handleUnknown` method in 
`core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala`. 
   
   It replaces the standard `error()` function with 
`SparkSubmit.printErrorAndExit()` when an unrecognized command-line option is 
encountered during `spark-submit` argument parsing.
   -->
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Currently, when `spark-submit` encounters an unrecognized option (like a 
malformed `--master` argument), it prints an error message, but the JVM 
terminates gracefully. This results in the process returning an OS exit code of 
`0` (success). 
   
   This causes "silent failures" in downstream orchestrators, bash scripts, and 
data pipelines (such as Apache Airflow) that rely strictly on the system exit 
code to determine if a job succeeded or failed. This fix ensures that an 
unrecognized option properly triggers a non-zero exit code (`1`) to notify the 
operating system of the failure.
   -->
   
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   No. 
   -->
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   This was tested manually by running `spark-submit` with a dummy unrecognized 
flag and verifying the system exit code (`echo $?` in Bash/PowerShell) outputs 
`1` instead of `0`. 
   
   Because this patch leverages Spark's built-in 
`SparkSubmit.printErrorAndExit()`, it safely integrates with existing test 
suites (like `SparkSubmitSuite`) without forcefully crashing the JVM via a hard 
`sys.exit()`.
   -->
   
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   Yes the documentation and overall navigation through the folders was 
Generated by :Google Gemini
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to