Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/369#discussion_r13418102
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
    @@ -423,6 +423,18 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
       def ++(other: RDD[T]): RDD[T] = this.union(other)
     
       /**
    +   * Return this RDD sorted by the given key function.
    +   */
    +  def sortBy[K](
    +      f: (T) ⇒ K,
    +      ascending: Boolean = true,
    +      numPartitions: Int = this.partitions.size)
    +      (implicit ord: Ordering[K], ctag: ClassTag[K]): RDD[T] =
    --- End diff --
    
    Look at the discussion at the beginning of this PR, but the reason for this 
is related to the fact that the user may want to actually specify the Ordering 
explicitly, so we didn't want the sugar. Also you can't include both a context 
bound for ClassTag and an implicit argument list, I believe.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to