Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18865#discussion_r132357070
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonFileFormat.scala
 ---
    @@ -114,7 +114,16 @@ class JsonFileFormat extends TextBasedFileFormat with 
DataSourceRegister {
         }
     
         (file: PartitionedFile) => {
    -      val parser = new JacksonParser(actualSchema, parsedOptions)
    +      // SPARK-21610: when the `requiredSchema` only contains 
`_corrupt_record`,
    --- End diff --
    
    I am actually rather -0 on this change. Both the current way and the 
previous way sound not quite compelling to me but the current way at least does 
arguably unnecessary parsing tries and we started to have this behaviour long 
time ago.. (at least I tried this in 1.6.3 and 1.5.2):
    
    ```scala
    import org.apache.spark.sql.types._
    
    val schema = new StructType().add("field", ByteType).add("_corrupt_record", 
StringType)
    val file = "/tmp/sample.json"
    val dfFromFile = sqlContext.read.schema(schema).json(file)
    dfFromFile.filter($"_corrupt_record".isNotNull).count()
    dfFromFile.filter($"_corrupt_record".isNull).count()
    ```



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to