On 12/2/2024 1:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
michael,
perhaps some of your perceived ambiguities could be reduced by the
ietf returning to no longer playing git repo for us, and stop formally
archiving expired internet-drafts? after all, they are expired.
We initially did that for a patent reasons -- having documented prior
art is sometimes very useful, even if the prior are was in a draft. I do
not think that reason has disappeared.
Then, it is also very useful to examine the diff between successive
versions. You call that "playing git repo", but i would rather have the
archive on an IETF server than in a third party tool like GitHub.
-- Christian Huitema
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rfc-interest-le...@rfc-editor.org
