Hi, On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:03:46PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > 1. xemacs in the far past had a small user base in comparison to > emacs, vi or even joe (as seen by number of downloads and how many > systems have it installed.) It hasnt had any spectacular growth in > news that I could see that changing.
are these statistics publicly available? I'm not interested in xemacs vs emacs and vi, but I would be interested in the bigger picture - what do people in RHEL land really use. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpVAqkBZd2t9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
