On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:03:46PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> 1. xemacs in the far past had a small user base in comparison to >> emacs, vi or even joe (as seen by number of downloads and how many >> systems have it installed.) It hasnt had any spectacular growth in >> news that I could see that changing. > > are these statistics publicly available? I'm not interested in xemacs > vs emacs and vi, but I would be interested in the bigger picture - > what do people in RHEL land really use.
Doubtful.. I went off of what packages were downloaded off of the mirrors back a long time ago, and data from a couple of private satellites I managed. I would think that the Smolt statistics are the only things that would be close to useful info thse days. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
