On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:03:46PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> 1. xemacs in the far past had a small user base in comparison to >>> emacs, vi or even joe (as seen by number of downloads and how many >>> systems have it installed.) It hasnt had any spectacular growth in >>> news that I could see that changing. >> >> are these statistics publicly available? I'm not interested in xemacs >> vs emacs and vi, but I would be interested in the bigger picture - >> what do people in RHEL land really use. > > Doubtful.. I went off of what packages were downloaded off of the > mirrors back a long time ago, and data from a couple of private > satellites I managed. I would think that the Smolt statistics are the > only things that would be close to useful info thse days. >
And saying that... my data is closed and therefore not reliable or useful. Sorry for the noise. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
