2009/4/21 Phil Schaffner <[email protected]>: > Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Bryan Hepworth wrote: >>> >>> machine. So common sense say's to run the processes in virtual machines >>> to >>> make more use of the machines as they stand. I'm familiar with vmware >>> server >>> 1, but noticed that vmware server 2 allows you to nominate cpu's for >>> virtual >>> machines which looks pretty good. >> >> We've done this with the free-beer VMWare ESXi and it's been decent. >> I have some generic notes: >> http://trac.biostr.washington.edu/trac/wiki/VmwareEsxi >> >> Due for an update this week according to rumors, I'm hoping they go >> open source with VMKernel. >> >> I'd also love to hear any experiences with XenServer (now free beer) >> or KVM. > > Sun VirtualBox is another option - both free-beer and free-speech.
Given that the recent betas of OpenSolaris include a Xen Dom0 and virt-manager, I'm not sure what the lifetime of Sun (surely you mean Oracle ;o) VirtualBox will be... -- Sam _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
