>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sharpe, Sam J >Sent: 21 April 2009 23:19 >To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga) discussion mailing-list >Subject: Re: [rhelv5-list] OT virtualisation choices > >2009/4/21 Phil Schaffner <[email protected]>: >> Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Bryan Hepworth wrote: >>>> >>>> machine. So common sense say's to run the processes in virtual >>>> machines to make more use of the machines as they stand. I'm >>>> familiar with vmware server 1, but noticed that vmware server 2 >>>> allows you to nominate cpu's for virtual machines which >looks pretty >>>> good. >>> >>> We've done this with the free-beer VMWare ESXi and it's been decent. >>> I have some generic notes: >>> http://trac.biostr.washington.edu/trac/wiki/VmwareEsxi >>> >>> Due for an update this week according to rumors, I'm hoping they go >>> open source with VMKernel. >>> >>> I'd also love to hear any experiences with XenServer (now >free beer) >>> or KVM. >> >> Sun VirtualBox is another option - both free-beer and free-speech. > >Given that the recent betas of OpenSolaris include a Xen Dom0 >and virt-manager, I'm not sure what the lifetime of Sun >(surely you mean Oracle ;o) VirtualBox will be... >-- >Sam
Time will tell I guess :-) _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
