From: John Summerfield <deb...@herakles.homelinux.org>

> I though I'd have a play with virtualisation, my previous efforts on Linux 
> have 
>been
> so dismal my preferred platform for the moment is Windows.

Care to expand on this?  In reality, what matters is not the host, but  the 
hypervisor.  The hypervisor is what defines support of both host and  guest.  
More importantly, it defines how well guests run on the hosted  platform.

For example, people tend to swear by VMware solutions, for various  reasons.  A 
big one is how VMware one only run guest OS, Windows.  They  assume the 
experience with Windows translates over to Linux guests as  well.  9 times out 
of 10 I have to point most of these individuals at  VMware's own documentation 
on Linux, or 3rd party solutions, on where  VMware, or the 3rd party product, 
doesn't do things for Linux that it  does for Windows.  The same issues are 
natively address with Xen or KVM,  let alone a full management solution in RHEV 
that just use the KVM  HyperVisor with all sorts of support (ala like comparing 
VMware  Workstation to ESX + vSphere platform).

Another big one is not comparing VMware products and OS types to one  another.  
A virtualization solution without management to one with (and  quite costly at 
that).  Comparing a server guest experience to a  workstation type usage.  
There 
are many of these details that end up  driving assumptions into areas where 
things don't work.  Now I'm not  going to argue that Xen 3.0.x in RHEL 5 
fullvirt running Windows is the  best, but that doesn't mean it's the only 
option for a RHEL 5 host.  There are many of us running KVM in RHEL 5, Fedora 
and RHEL 6  Beta that have no issues, let alone deploying RHEV.

And to expand options, VMware Workstation is a product that runs Windows  well 
on older Linux host releases.  In fact I've seen many people  compare VMware 
Workstation on Windows to the Xen bundled with early RHEL  5 versions, without 
comparing apples-to-apples.  That means comparing  either Hyper-V bundled with 
Windows to Xen (or KVM for that matter) on  RHEL, or VMware Workstation to 
VMware workstation on both Windows and  Linux.  Look at all options, make a 
comparison of all options.

There are many HyperVisors and many options in solutions out there, for  both 
Linux and Windows as hosts and guests that have varying experience  and 
support.  To sum it up to just Linux or Windows as a platform is not  telling 
me 
much, hence why I'm asking for more details on this  statement.  ;)

_______________________________________________
rhelv5-list mailing list
rhelv5-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list

Reply via email to