Once upon a time, Ljubomir Ljubojevic <off...@plnet.rs> said: > Do all of you even realize how many bugs Red Hat has to resolve to move > from Fedora sources to bugs free stable product?? If you even done ANY > programming you would understand how complicated is to solve all the > issues popping all the time.
Yes, I do understand that. But then I look at the differences between beta1 and beta2 and see some significant version changes (such as Dovecot jumping from 1.2.9 to 2.0beta8 - a beta version in RHEL?), which should not be happening after a beta release. That indicates to me poor project management and the possibility of an even more delayed release (which may cause additional packages to get upgrades, causing more delays, etc.), or a rushed release that is not stable. Now, I'd much prefer to see Dovecot 2.0 in a long-term release like RHEL, but a change like that should have been made before the first beta. What I heard originally was that RHEL 6 was going to be based on Fedora 12, which was released almost a year ago. When the first RHEL 6 beta was released, there were a fair number of packages that looked to be based on Fedora 13 instead, which indicates much less testing time (and throwing away some of the Fedora-based testing, since the package mix was changed). The second beta upgraded some packages to newer versions that appear to be based on the Fedora 14 development tree (F14 will reach beta next week). -- Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. _______________________________________________ rhelv6-beta-list mailing list rhelv6-beta-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list
