I think you missed something VERY important. Bi-Directional! I LOVE
that I can inject values from a template into the code. For example,
my picture viewing application. The XHTML template specifies how many
Columns per row (5), How many pictures per page (20). On the WML, it
says show 1 picture per row, 3 per page.

The beauty? The backend only has ONE set of logic for ALL the
templates. I think that is the beauty of the no logic in the
templates. That's TRUE MVC in my opinion.

Cheers,
  Tyler


On 2/10/06, Geert Bevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the input Oliver,
>
> I tell this most of the time and sadly people just nod and move
> along, still thinking it looks like crap.
>
> On 10-feb-06, at 13:25, Oliver Dohmen wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > only a short note.
> >
> > Point them to the alternative Tag Versions with "[! /]", because it
> > dont mess up the other tags and make it easier to read.
> >
> > For me the language is very clear and only uses minimalistic
> > markup. That makes my templates more readable and i don`t mess
> > it up with script code or noisy markup. If you have to work with
> > designers, they are very glad if they do not need to learn a bunch
> > of tags or
> > anything else. Extra Attributes in Tags are only usefull, if they
> > don`t confuse the designer tools.
> >
> > cu odo
> > Am 10.02.2006 um 13:15 schrieb Geert Bevin:
> >
> >> Thanks Eddy,
> >>
> >> the <!-- --> syntax benefit is what I often bring forward, but it
> >> somehow never provides enough weight. They point to Tapestry and
> >> Wicket as another way of doing it invisibly. When I explain that
> >> the templates in RIFE are not limited to XML documents and that
> >> they are used for any text-based format, they usually don't really
> >> think that's important.
> >>
> >> The minimum amount of base tags is a good point, I usually forget
> >> to mention that. There's a fourth one though: I ;-)
> >>
> >> Thanks for the input,
> >>
> >> Geert
> >>
> >>>> Hi everybody,
> >>>> I'm writing my presentation about RIFE for TSSJS, and I just
> >>>> *know* that many people in the audience will shriek when they
> >>>> see the template syntax for the first time.
> >>>> What do you guys consider a killer argument to defend it and
> >>>> make them at least accept it as a possibility? Most people I
> >>>> speak with keep saying they don't like the look of it and round
> >>>> and round it goes.
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Geert
> >>>
> >>> The use of <!-- --> does not break the layout in HTML editors.
> >>>
> >>> You have only three base tags, V, B and BV, through which all
> >>> kinds of information can be presented. Compare that to the
> >>> hundreds of tags for other web frameworks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Geert Bevin                       Uwyn bvba
> >> "Use what you need"               Avenue de Scailmont 34
> >> http://www.uwyn.com               7170 Manage, Belgium
> >> gbevin[remove] at uwyn dot com    Tel +32 64 84 80 03
> >>
> >> PGP Fingerprint : 4E21 6399 CD9E A384 6619  719A C8F4 D40D 309F D6A9
> >> Public PGP key  : available at servers pgp.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Rife-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rife-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
>
> --
> Geert Bevin                       Uwyn bvba
> "Use what you need"               Avenue de Scailmont 34
> http://www.uwyn.com               7170 Manage, Belgium
> gbevin[remove] at uwyn dot com    Tel +32 64 84 80 03
>
> PGP Fingerprint : 4E21 6399 CD9E A384 6619  719A C8F4 D40D 309F D6A9
> Public PGP key  : available at servers pgp.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rife-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
>
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users

Reply via email to