Hi Frederic,
this is definitely a good idea, however you would be duplicating
information again, in this case the submission name.
Another idea there is to create named groups and to use those to
declare a dependency graph. It's an interesting idea, however I think
that in practice people will just use the submission names though.
So, it still feels to me that the positioning scheme I proposed is
the best solution.
What do you think?
Geert
On 04 Jul 2006, at 01:23, Frederic Daoud wrote:
Otherwise submissions can't be
declared before their parameters, for example. Methods and fields
that current
position annotation should be analyzed first. Those without any
position
information come afterwards.
I was looking up something in TestNG and I came across how you
determine
your test method order (if you need one):
http://testng.org/doc/documentation-main.html#dependent-methods
Could that be another option for our situation? That is, submission
parameters "depend" on their parent submission?
--
Geert Bevin
Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com
RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org
Music and words - http://gbevin.com
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
