> So, it still feels to me that the positioning scheme I proposed is > the best solution. > > What do you think?
Honestly, it's hard to predict any issues there could be in practice. The solution has to be on the road for a while first. But, like you said, there is no duplication of information, Should be pretty simple to number your submission N and its parameters N.1, N.2, etc. My biggest issue was renumbering, but with your proposed scheme it shouldn't be a problem. Like you said, if you have a submission N and parameters N.1 thru N.10, and you need to insert an extra parameter between 5 and 6, you could just number it N.5.1 and leave the others untouched. So yes, probably that's the best solution.. Would you still have to leave "space" between submissions? For example, you if you have submissions 1 and 2, with parameters 1.1, 1.2, etc. and 2.1, 2.2, etc., and you need to insert a new submission and its parameters between 1 and 2? Frederic _______________________________________________ Rife-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
