----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected] > 2015-01-19 16:07, Cowboy wrote: > > > Rivendell, being a *professional* automation system by and for > > *professional* broadcasters, I can see where the production rat > > has spent hours getting a piece "just so" to have it destroyed by > > a machine's idea of what "sounds even" to a human. > "Rivendell, being a *professional* automation system" -> That's one > reason more why Rivendell might need Loudness Normalization. > > > Peak normalization does not affect the "sound" of a piece in any > > way, > Loudness Normalization does exactly the same. > > > Of course, if everything went through the prod room before being > > imported, there would be no need for any normalization at all, > Big disagree. In times of the loudness war it is even more necessary > to have a proper (loudness) normalization. > Those days mastering is often done by teenagers who can use some DAW > software but don't have any clue of mastering or for what it really is > needed.
I think we ought to standardize on our definitions: "Normalization", of whatever type, is something which happens inter-track, across a library, not intra-track, inside a single song. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [email protected] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274 _______________________________________________ Rivendell-dev mailing list [email protected] http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
