I do agree - setting up a main Rivendell "server", even if it is on an
older desktop PC with a couple of hard disks in a RAID mirror - in my
view is a better option then using a cloud-based server.  If you're able
to set up 2 servers which can mirror each other, perhaps get aman up and
running so that they are easily hot-swappable in the event of failure,
that could - in my opinion - offer a more robust system then relying on
a 3rd party cloud-server provider.

For an inexpensive setup, one Rivendell setup that I did put together on
very little budget included  a decent desktop based PC as the central
"server" (about a 4 year old AMD quad core that was around $100, added
in a pair of 1 GB RAID mirrored hard disks), some 2005/2006 era Pentium
4-2.8Ghz desktop PC's as the workstations (they had all of 1 GB memory
and 40GB hard disks, worth around $20 - $40 each), all connected through
its own 24 port 3com Superstack II 3300 10/100 switch I picked up off
ebay for $20.  Plus a used M-Audio Delta card.  While that system has
never been put on the air, it has never had any issues either - it just
works.  The big thing though - I went through each machine before
putting anything into service, replaced any faulty caps, and for the
P4-2.8's I ended up compiling Rivendell from source since those CPU's
were old enough they were not 64-bit capable and needed a 32-bit OS. 

If I were doing something similar on an equally limited budget the main
things I'd change would be to look for a full GB switch (the 10/100
works fine and the price was a good  purchase, but decent gigabit
switches are getting cheaper), larger hard disks for storage, and
perhaps try and find workstations with CPU's that'll run a 64-bit OS to
let me run the appliance.  

Just something to think about.

> 
> Following your posts I must suggest that if the PC's you have available 
> are able to run Vista they are well able to run Rivendell.
> 
> Yes it's nice to have a server which has a large HDD but if there is no 
> money to buy a 4TB   [ x 2] you can clump together a server with 2 or 
> more of the biggest drives in the fleet in an array. It works and plenty 
> of motherboards will run 4 SATA drives. Obviously the biggest fastest 
> bestest machine becomes the server.
> 
> RAM for the server is not that expensive, you can turbo up an older 
> machine with some RAM. MySQL likes RAM.
> 
> Whatever you build, make sure you have 100% backup; a copy somewhere you 
> can swing in when the #1 fails. Better have 2, one on site, and one off 
> site.
> 
> Any copy which is at a remote facility may be secure, but it can take a 
> week or two to download. Any facility operated by a third party may be 
> convenient for sharing, but is not to be trusted. I have two remote 
> sites where my system is replicated. We use various cloud services for 
> programme sharing news etc and the error / corruption rate is 
> significant. OK for a programme provider to reload material which is 
> delivered well in advance. Not OK if you are planning to use it in real 
> time.
> 
> Working with not for profits who don't get funds and grants, until they 
> can demonstrate that they are worthy, is a challenge to your ingenuity.
> 
> It can be the most satisfying work you will ever do.
> 
> regards
> 
> Robert Jeffares
> 
> -- *Big Valley Radio*
> 64 Warner Park Avenue
> 
> Laingholm
> 
> Auckland 0604
> 
> 09 8176358
> 
> 0221693124
> 
> 06 650 6087<hr>_______________________________________________
> Rivendell-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

Reply via email to