Hi, On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Tom Hobbs <[email protected]> wrote: > If the current poms do 50% (number chosen at random) of what we want them to > do, > then fine. My personal opinion is that it would be a bit demoralising to > back them > out because they're not "perfect" when we can include a valuable contribution > and > make them "perfect" in the next release.
+1 Incremental improvement is a key to success. BR, Jukka Zitting
