Hey Peter, On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Peter Firmstone <[email protected]> wrote: > By the sound of what Dennis is saying, it appears more to be a > classification issue rather than an issue with the pom's themselves.
Yes. > I'd also like to thank you Jeff for your effort. Most welcome! > Getting the artefacts out there also means that there'll be people using > them, if there are issues, they'll be sorted sooner. > > Anyone have any last minute changes before we unleash (just kidding, I'm in > a good mood), I mean release River? This shouldn't impact a River release, but I don't think the poms belong in the src dir--rather, they should probably be at the root of the project. When the src dir is designated a Java source directory in Eclipse it makes it hard to navigate the poms since it tries to turn their parent directory structure into packages. Additionally, their current location suggests they should be in the classpath, which is not the case. > The world has waited long enough. Jukka, you still happy to assist with the > process? > > Cheers, > > Peter. Thanks for the help, Peter! -jeff
