I agree as well. Let's get something out.
Jim
On Oct 1, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Tom Hobbs <[email protected]>
wrote:
If the current poms do 50% (number chosen at random) of what we
want them to do,
then fine. My personal opinion is that it would be a bit
demoralising to back them
out because they're not "perfect" when we can include a valuable
contribution and
make them "perfect" in the next release.
+1 Incremental improvement is a key to success.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
