By the sound of what Dennis is saying, it appears more to be a
classification issue rather than an issue with the pom's themselves.
I'd also like to thank you Jeff for your effort.
Getting the artefacts out there also means that there'll be people using
them, if there are issues, they'll be sorted sooner.
Anyone have any last minute changes before we unleash (just kidding, I'm
in a good mood), I mean release River?
The world has waited long enough. Jukka, you still happy to assist with
the process?
Cheers,
Peter.
Jim Waldo wrote:
I agree as well. Let's get something out.
Jim
On Oct 1, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Tom Hobbs <[email protected]> wrote:
If the current poms do 50% (number chosen at random) of what we want
them to do,
then fine. My personal opinion is that it would be a bit
demoralising to back them
out because they're not "perfect" when we can include a valuable
contribution and
make them "perfect" in the next release.
+1 Incremental improvement is a key to success.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
