On Tue, 13 May 2014 12:19:18 +0100 John Horne <john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk> wrote:
> > > Debatable, but I think not. If you make a mistake in the config file, > > > then I think RKH should tell you rather than ignoring it. Having said > > > that, some options may well ignore things (EXISTWHITELIST as far as I > > > remember does this). > I really can't remember if this applies to SCRIPTWHITELIST, but in your > rkhunter.conf.local file put 'SCRIPTWHITELIST=""' this should remove any > previously seen settings for that option. Then, after that line, add in > any required SCRIPTWHITELIST lines excluding the GET one. > > As said, it may or may not work :-) It works. It is still not covenient, because I will have to update SCRIPTWHITELIST entries from future package updates (copy SCRIPTWHITELIST entries from rkhunter.conf to rkhunter.conf.local manually). I'd still suggest to ignore SCRIPTWHITELIST as EXISTWHITELIST, because if you make a mistake in it, rkhunter will warn about script executable. Regards, Nerijus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Rkhunter-users mailing list Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
