Uite așa arată mount vs /proc/mounts: [root@aldebaran ~]# mount securityfs on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) /dev/md2 on /DataVolume type xfs (rw,usrquota) /dev/md4 on /ExtendVolume type xfs (rw,usrquota)
[root@aldebaran ~]# cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0 proc /proc proc rw 0 0 sys /sys sysfs rw 0 0 /dev/pts /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0 securityfs /sys/kernel/security securityfs rw 0 0 /dev/md3 /var ext3 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0 /dev/md2 /DataVolume xfs rw,noatime,uqnoenforce 0 0 /dev/ram0 /mnt/ram tmpfs rw 0 0 /dev/md2 /shares/Public xfs rw,noatime,uqnoenforce 0 0 /dev/md2 /shares/Download xfs rw,noatime,uqnoenforce 0 0 /dev/md2 /shares/Kits xfs rw,noatime,uqnoenforce 0 0 /dev/md2 /shares/Movies xfs rw,noatime,uqnoenforce 0 0 /dev/md2 /shares/Music xfs rw,noatime,uqnoenforce 0 0 Share-urile respective sunt făcute din sistemul lui de management (teoretic sunt exportate ca share-uri samba/nfs). 2013/9/30 Nicu <[email protected]> > 2013/9/30 Nicu <[email protected]> > > > 2013/9/30 Adrian Popa <[email protected]> > > > >> Cred că dacă ar fi fost bind-mounted, ar fi apărut în output-ul lui > mount, > >> nu? În cazul meu nu apare. Directoarele au un hard link count > 1: > >> > > > > uita-te si-n /proc/mounts > > > > si-n plus, sistemul ala poate ca foloseste clone(CLONE_NEWNS) -- desi eu > n-am intilnit pina acum. > _______________________________________________ > RLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug > _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug
