On 26 Mar 2001 22:54:52 +0300, Matei Conovici wrote: > > > bind > ---- > > Run Resolved Failed Queries/sec > 1 61063 4473 28.00 > > dnscache > -------- > > Run Resolved Failed Queries/sec > 1 64662 874 36.00 Hmmm... Deci in primul tur, dnscache a fost mai rapid. Cum ai setat nameserverele? Sint legate direct la root-servere? Sau au alte nameservere ca forwardere? -- Florin Andrei --- Send e-mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe rlug' to unsubscribe from this list.
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) Matei Conovici
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) Mihai RUSU
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) Mihai RUSU
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) Mihai RUSU
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) Matei Conovici
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-... Mihai RUSU
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-... Matei Conovici
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-... Florin Andrei
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-... Matei Conovici
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) Matei Conovici
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) Florin Andrei
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) Matei Conovici
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) RoLinux
- [rlug] Re: bind vs. djbdns + FLAME BAIT :-) Florin Andrei
