On Friday 12 July 2002 11:07, Catalin Muresan wrote: Nu Vreau sa te contrazic Vreau doar sa dau o solutie Nu poti pune orice valoare intre 0-254 in netmask ca sa-ti rezulte o subretea valida Daca vrei sa te lamuresti citeste documentatia de la IPV4 referitoare la netmask Cel mai simpul esta sa calculezi in binar nu in zecimal. Uite cateva linkuri
http://www.pku.edu.cn/academic/research/computer-center/tc/html/TC0306.html http://www.pku.edu.cn/academic/research/computer-center/tc/html/TC0303.html http://www.cites.uiuc.edu/techsupport/firewall/powersoftwo.html > > Raspunsul corect este B : > > Nu exista netmask 255.255.255.208 > > dece? > > > ./ipcalc.pl 140.173.169.203/255.255.255.208 > > Corrected illegal netmask: 255.255.255.208 > > dece? > > > Address: 140.173.169.203 10001100.10101101.10101001.11 001011 > > Netmask: 255.255.255.192 = 26 11111111.11111111.11111111.11 000000 > > Wildcard: 0.0.0.63 00000000.00000000.00000000.00 111111 > > => > > Network: 140.173.169.192/26 10001100.10101101.10101001.11 000000 > > (Class B) Broadcast: 140.173.169.255 10001100.10101101.10101001.11 > > 111111 HostMin: 140.173.169.193 10001100.10101101.10101001.11 > > 000001 HostMax: 140.173.169.254 10001100.10101101.10101001.11 > > 111110 Hosts/Net: 62 -- Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO (or Linux) is the answer. --- Pentru dezabonare, trimiteti mail la [EMAIL PROTECTED] cu subiectul 'unsubscribe rlug'. REGULI, arhive si alte informatii: http://www.lug.ro/mlist/
