Huh?! Faptul ca se pune si direct cand se pune reverse e o chestie care nu e obligatoriu, e foarte discutabil daca ar trebui sa fie default sau nu. In orice situatie ar fi asta nu e cu nimic relevant despre calitatea serviciilor acelui ISP.
Poate nu am inteles eu bine dar s-a cerut si directul de catre client ? On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, The Sorcerer wrote: > Unirii "nu aflase" ca el a platit la timp in mall, alt exemplu ar fi > cam 80% din dns-urile clientzilor ... au reverse dns dar NU au dns ... > exemplu concret : > > timax.rdsnet.ro > > host 213.157.162.16 ns.rdsnet.ro > Using domain server: > Name: ns.rdsnet.ro > Address: 193.231.236.10#53 > Aliases: > > 16.162.157.213.in-addr.arpa. domain name pointer timax.rdsnet.ro. > > host timax.rdsnet.ro ns.rdsnet.ro > Using domain server: > Name: ns.rdsnet.ro > Address: 193.231.236.17#53 > Aliases: > > Host timax.rdsnet.ro. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) > > host timax.rdsnet.ro ns2.rdsnet.ro > Using domain server: > Name: ns2.rdsnet.ro > Address: 193.231.236.10#53 > Aliases: > > Host timax.rdsnet.ro. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)> > > > > Morala poveshtii (ca o lungesc prea mult) este ca rds are mai > putzini admini decat probleme, asha ca singura solutzie este sa dai > telefon in mod repetat pana se rezolva (putzin cam tampita dar din > pacate singura eficace) > > ----- > if IT still doesn't work then > try again, but this time > use a bigger HAMMER > > > ---------------------------- Mihai RUSU Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any company, unless otherwise specifically stated.
