Using that logic, if you were a departed Microsoft developer, you'd be unemployable. How would a prospective employer know you had seen the code unless you told them? In other words, just don't tell.
I'd like to know what open source programmers think of MS quality. I mean, is MS code really as bad as people will lead you to believe? You have to admit, some of the stuff that code can do is pretty impressive and the newer NT based versions seem pretty stable. Is the code more like a patched beach ball or is it fairly clean? Open Source code has to be clean because everybody sees it. As a result, OS programmers are self-disciplined to write clean efficient code to maintain good standing in the community. - Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kyle T. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:15 PM Subject: Re: [RLUG] Leaked MS Code Not only open source projects, but any project. Having looked at the leaked Windows source could potentialy effect your future employability as many companies will not want to employ someone that has been tainted by seeing MS's intellectual property. It is probably best to just stay as far away from it as possible. Kyle _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
