On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 06:08:20PM -0700, Christopher Baus wrote: > I have two accounts at rosehosting with mixed results. The first
Rosehosting uses "a custom-built in-house solution," according to their pre-sales folks. So, one possible lesson from this is "don't trust non-standard, closed-source solutions." That's not to say that QoS can't be an issue. AFAIK, only Virtuozzo and VMware ESX support any sort of QoS. And with UML, while you can renice the UML, that still may not provide you with the same level of resource balancing that fair-scheduling or other schedulers may offer. This is, in fact, something I'm researching right now. I suppose that if there are alternative schedulers availale, one could patch the host kernel at the same time one applies the SKAS patch. But I can't speak to this from experience. -- Find my Techno-Geek Journal at http://www.codegnome.org/geeklog/ _______________________________________________ RLUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rlug.org/mailman/listinfo/rlug
