Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Keeping stuff like this optional and in the editing aid realm becomes > difficult when people write specs like this: > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/conformance.html#strict
That is a disappointing thing to see. I had not realized until now
that the spec says a valid XHTML 2.0 document _must_ contain an
xsi:schemaLocation attribute.
And their example includes the following as well:
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css"
href="http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/style/xhtml2.css";?>
I was looking through the "28.1.3. Specifying external style
sheets" section[1] of the spec to see if it provided any guidance
about how an application is expected to deal with that PI if the
document also contains <style> elements.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-styleSheet.html#sec_28.1.3.
But as far as I can see, in the case where a document contains
both one or more PIs specifying one or more CSS stylesheets, and
one or more <style> elements specifying one more CSS stylesheets,
it does not specify which an application should prefer.
--Mike
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
