Michael Smith wrote: > Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Keeping stuff like this optional and in the editing aid realm becomes >>difficult when people write specs like this: >>http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/conformance.html#strict > > That is a disappointing thing to see. I had not realized until now > that the spec says a valid XHTML 2.0 document _must_ contain an > xsi:schemaLocation attribute.
I strongly doubt that that specific requirement will survive Last Call, and feedback to the WG on how and why you dislike that will only make that easier. The groups that work on document formats inside W3C are starting to talk about common schema strategies and I have hope that one output of these discussions will be dragging xsi:schemaLocation out in the backyard and having it shot in the head. (On an unrelated note, anyone with articles and thoughts about how people should best go about producing schemata independently from one another while still making it very easy for third parties to combine them to create schemata for compound documents would be /very/ welcome. I don't see NVDL being pushed anywhere near as much as it should be, is there a problem?). -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> <font face=arial size=-1><a href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h7ihj2g/M=362329.6886308.7839368.1510227/D=groups/S=1706030390:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1122864736/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992 ">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font> --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
