>> I don't really have strong opinions on which particular service we use, >> but having someone volunteer for the actual legwork is a definite bonus. >> >> > It seems relevant to mention that GNOME is thinking about switching to > Gitlab. They wrong a small comparison between Phabricator and Gitlab here: > https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/DevelopmentInfrastructure/ > This may provide food for thought. > Having installing both gitlab and phabricator on my server, I can say that > both are pretty easy to install. > In both cases, I can volunteer to do the admin work, and I can give access > to the server to one or two people to help me, this way we don't end up in > the current situation. > If that helps, I cloned rockbox in both my gitlab and phabricator > instances, so that you can have a feel of what it looks like: > GitLab: https://gitlab.pouly.fr/pamaury/rockbox-clone > I'll send the link to phabricator later, because it is still importing the > repostory. > NOTE: importing repositories with Phabricator is super slow (it's been > importing for severall hours now). > And here is the link to Phabricator: http://phabricator.pouly.fr/diffusion/R/
So basically the choice seems to be betwen Gitlab (self-host), Phabricator (self-host) and Github.
