FWIW, I've been using Acegi on my site since 2.0 and haven't had any lost posts. I regularly use the UI to post, as well as using a blog editor. I suggest we *strongly* encourage our users to use tools like MarsEdit, w.bloggar and Performancing for Firefox. These will generally have a nicer and easier to use UI than we can produce - and they all work with Roller!
Matt On 2/21/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I fully agree. Acegi should be able to maintain posted data through a > login. The other reason to fix this in Acegi and not use the > keepalive.jsp is that this situation is technically a problem on any > form anywhere in the UI and we can't have the keepalive.jsp included in > all of our forms. > > -- Allen > > > On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 06:05, David M Johnson wrote: > > I'd much rather fix the Acegi POST-through-auth problem than re- > > introduce keep-alive. If we do it, we should make it optional so > > security conscious installations can turn it off. > > > > - Dave > > > > > > > > On Feb 21, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Lance Lavandowska wrote: > > > > > Dave and I had a bit of a commit war, where he commented it out, I > > > uncommented it, .... > > > > > > Eventually he won. I'm not certain, but I think his concerns were > > > server load and/or that the iframe I was using was unattractive > > > (though I did my best to make it look nice). > > > > > > My 2 bits, obviously, suggest putting it back in. > > > > > > Lance > > > > > > On 2/20/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> but is it still used? the only place I see it referenced is in > > >> WeblogEdit.jsp and it's commented out. i just checked and it's been > > >> commented out since before Roller 1.2 so it hasn't been used for > > >> quite a > > >> while. > > >> > > >> -- Allen > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:10, Matt Raible wrote: > > >>> Lance added this to keep the session alive while editing a blog. I > > >>> think it's important especially since Acegi doesn't hold request > > >>> parameters though a login. > > >>> > > >>> Matt > > >>> > > >>> On 2/20/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>> this looks like an old and unused session debugging tool, do we > > >>>> need to > > >>>> keep it? > > >>>> > > >>>> -- Allen > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > >
