> Isn't there a larger issue with RFC2047 format subject lines? If the >charset declaration was unrecognized, wasn't the server attempting to >render the base64-encoded text as if it encoded a Unicode string? Ah, but the questionable messages do not *have* RFC2047 format subject lines. The last few messages shigerugo had trouble with, had the subject lines written out as raw Big5 (or maybe some other character set) *instead* of being encoded in RFC2047 format. If it were RFC2047 and our iconv simply didn't have a conversion on file for the declared charset, that would be a different story. We could provide a place for the site operator to add more aliases, and things would probably be ok.
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) fleeb
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) dothebart
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) fleeb
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) dothebart
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) LoanShark
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) dothebart
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) dothebart
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) wizard of aahz
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) fleeb
- [Citadel Development] (no subject) IGnatius T Foobar