On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:33:34 -0500, John Siracusa wrote: Hi John
> "Any Rose::DB object method that sets a data source configuration > value is a valid parameter name." Well, yes, but it's been decades since I tried to memorize /all/ the documentation for a project. > Hm, I wonder if that's a feature or a bug? :) Tim? > RDBO auto-init! :) Ahh, I see you're referring to $meta->auto_initialize; The only call to primary_key_info I found is in Rose::DB::Object::Metadata::Auto, which will presumably just work, since it ultimately calls $db->schema, and the new docs will have told the user to set schema appropriately for Oracle, right? > Okay, but what about the case where you have no explicitly set > schema and list_tables() returns a table owned by some other user, > then you call primary_key_info() passing your username and get no > info back? Then that's telling you there's a false assumption in your code... Anyway, if schema is unset, how could it return table names for other users? Anyway, do other db drivers have to worry about this possibility? Anyway, I vote not to worry about this situation until we receive a bug report with a corresponding patch :-)). -- Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://savage.net.au/index.html ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object